Persian Kings of Egypt
Very little of the history of Egypt is known for the next century and a quarter. Most of what has been preserved comes from Greek sources. The chronology of the period is correctly preserved by Manetho. It is in full agreement with the Persian records. Minor controversial details that do not pertain to Egypt, but to Persia, will be treated there.
Manetho's history of Persian dominion begins thus: "Cambyses in the fifth year of his kingship over the Persians became king of Egypt." The fifth year was 525-524, spring-to-spring reckoning in Persian annals. Cambyses reigned over Egypt three years, according to Eusebius' extract, 525-522, EXCLUSIVE reckoning. He was followed by the Magi who seized the throne and reigned for 7 months in 522.
The account of Africanus differs
considerably and has never been understood by historians. He records
that Cambyses reigned over Egypt 6 years, INCLUSIVE reckoning,
527-522. The 8-year reign of Cambyses in Persia extentled from
529-521. Africanus reckons to the end of Cambyses' eighth year
(December 31, 522 according to Egyptian reckoning) even though the
Persian monarch died early in the eighth year, March 522. But what of
the date 527 for the beginning of his reign in Egypt? The only
possible answer is that Africanus -- and Manetho -- considered the
dominion of the Persian king in Egypt as beginning in the year that
the Egyptian exiles returned. Africanus thus is a witness to the
fulfillment of Ezekiel's prophecy of the 40-years' exile -- 567-527!
The kings of Persia, including illegitimate rulers (in parentheses),
are now listed in chart form in the traditional Greek spelling. The
dates are according to the Egyptian calendar, which regularly
preceded the Persian by three to four months.
Dynasty XXVII -- Kings of Persia |
Lengths of Reign |
Dates (Egyptian reckoning) |
Cambyses |
6 (A)
|
Jan. 2, 527-Dec. 31, 522 |
3 (E)
|
525-522 (Conquest to Magian revolt) |
|
(Magi |
7 months (E only)
|
522) |
Darius |
36
|
Jan. 1, 521-Dec. 22, 486 |
Xerxes "the Great" |
21
|
Dec. 23, 486-Dec. 16, 465 |
(Artabanus |
7 months (A only)
|
465) |
Artaxerxes |
41 (A)
|
Dec. 17, 465-Dec. 6, 424 |
40 (E)
|
465-425 |
|
(Xerxes (II) |
2 months
|
424) |
(Sogdianus |
7 months
|
424) |
Darius (II) |
19
|
Dec. 7, 424-Dec. 1, 405 |
The specific dates for the commencement of the Egyptian years may be found in "Manuel d'Histoire de Genealogie et de Chronologie de tous les Etats du Globe", by A.-M.-H.-J. Stokvis, vol 1.
Egypt Rebels
Over 120 years elapsed since Persian armies marched into Egypt. Darius was now dead. Smoldering revolt suddenly flared into the open. Though Persian authority was tacitly acknowledged for a few years, Egypt became virtually independent. Persian and mercenary armies were sent against the land of the Nile. Unsuccessful attempts followed one another until 343, when Egyptian forces collapsed before a determined Persian onslaught.The history of this fast-moving period begins with Dynasty XXVIII of Sais. This dynasty -- if it even deserved that designation -- consisted of one king, Amyrteos. His reign lasted only 6 years, 405-399. He was overthrown by pretenders from the city of Mendes, whose rulers constituted Dynasty XXIX.
None of these dynasties were of ancient royalty. They were largely of prominent families, often of foreign descent.
The duration of Dynasty XXIX was only
20 years, after which it, too, was overthrown. The evidence of
Manetho, as preserved by Africanus, Eusebius and Syncellus is as
follows.
Dynasty XXIX of Mendes according to Africanus |
Lengths of Reign |
Eusebius |
Lengths of Reign |
Nepherites |
6
|
Nepherites |
6
|
Achoris |
13
|
Achoris |
13 or 12 (in the Canon)
|
Psammuthls |
1
|
Psammuthis |
1
|
Nepherltes (II) |
4 months
|
Nepherites (II) |
4 months
|
|
Muthis |
1
|
In the Armenian version of Eusebius Muthes precedes Nepherites. Eusebius also assigns 13 years to Achoris in the Armeinan, which is the total length of his reign.
The real puzzle that has confounded historians of this period is found in the Demotic Chronicle. The Chronicle places the name Psammuthis before Achoris, in apparent opposition to Manetho. The apparent contradiction would vanish if each writer were to be carefully compared with the other. Manetho and the Chronicle both preserve part of the facts: neither preserves all the details. But how could Achoris precede Psammuthis and yet have Psammuthis precede Achoris?
The key is found in Eusebius' Canon, which contains one version of Manetho not found elsewhere. The Canon notes that Achoris reigned 12 years before Psammuthis. As Achoris reigned 13 years altogether, the final year must have succeeded the one-year reign of Psammuthis. That is, Achoris was deposed, and returned to the throne a year later.
Remarkably, the unnamed king who
follows Nepherites and precedes Psammuthis in the Demotic Chronicle
is said to have been "deposed." Psammuthis usurped his
throne one year. Then Achoris appears followed by Nepherites II.
These details may be placed in chart form as follows:
Names of Kings of Dynasty XXIX of Mendes |
Lengths of Reign |
Dates |
Nepherites |
6
|
399-393 |
Achoris |
12
|
393-381 |
Psammuthis |
1
|
381-380 |
Achoris (again) |
1 (the 13th year)
|
380-379 |
Muthis (jointly with Achoris) |
1
|
380-379 |
Nepherites (II), son of Achoris |
4 months
|
379-378 (winter) |
It is to be noted that Muthis succeeds Psammuthis and reigns during the same calendar year that Achoris returns to the throne. This is made clear by the fact that his name is left out in Africanus' account in which Achoris is assigned 13 years. Eusebius, in one case, adds Muthis to his list in which Achoris is assigned only 12 years.
Why the years commencing in 381 suddenly became politically unstable will become apparent when unveiling the mystery of Dynasty XX of Thebes!
But to continue the history of Egypt
with Africanus' epitome of Dynasty XXX of Sebennytus. (The monumental
names are in parentheses.)
Kings of Dynasty XXX of Sebennytus |
Lengths of Reign |
Dates |
Nectanebes (Nekhtnebef) |
18
|
379-361 |
Teos (Takhos) |
2
|
361-359 |
Nectanebos (Nekhtharehbe) |
18
|
359-341 |
The Demotic Chronicle (IV, 14) assigns to Nekhtnebef a reign of 19 years -- 380-361. This begins with the year that Achoris returned to power. In the previous line in the Demotic Chronicle a length of only 16 years is assigned -- 377-361. What event occurred in the calendar year beginning 377 will be clarified by the history of Dynasty XX of Thebes!
The account of Dynasty XXX found in
Eusebius' Canon is the same as Africanus'. But in the Armenian
Version of Eusebius and in Syncellus' account of Eusebius the
following differences should be noticed.
Dynasty XXX of Sebennytus According to Eusebius |
Lengths of Reign |
Dates |
Nectanebis |
10
|
371-361 |
Teos |
2
|
361-359 |
Nectanebos |
8
|
359-351 |
This epitome of Manetho is chronologically abridged. But it does indicate major military or political events for the calendar years beginning in 371 and 351. The significance of the year beginning 371 again lies in the history of Dynasty XX of Thebes. In the calendar year beginning 351 an important invasion of Egypt was unsuccessfully attempted by the Persians ("Diodorus Siculus", XV, 40, 3) See also A. T. Olmstead's "History of the Persian Empire", revised edition -- one of the most accurate texts covering this century of Egyptian quasi-independence.
In 343 -- in the sixteenth year of Nectanebos -- a great Persian campaign against Egypt was mounted. The Delta soon fell. The Egyptian king fled to Ethiopia where he continued to exercise authority over Upper Egypt for another two years -- to 341.
In 341 the last vestige of Egyptian
independence vanished. The short-lived Persian dominion which
followed constituted Dynasty XXXI.
Persian Kings of Dynasty XXXI |
Lengths of Reign |
Dates |
Ochus |
2
|
341-339 |
Arses |
3
|
339-336 |
Darius |
4
|
336-332 |
The conquest of Egypt by Alexander the Great occurred in 332.
And Now Dynasty XX of Thebes
The authority of Thebes over Egypt disappeared about 663 with the Assyrian conquest. For almost three centuries no native dynasty is known to have been centered in the ancient capital of Upper Egypt. Yet, according to Manetho and the archaeological record, Thebes was again to become the capital of Upper Egypt! Its rulers -- including the famous Ramessids III to XI -- constitute Dynasty XX.The famous Papyrus Harris contains a historical record of the period immediately prior to the rise of Dynasty XX. It reads:
"The land of Egypt was cast aside with every man a law unto himself. They had no chief spokesman for many years previously up to other times. The land of Egypt consisted of officials and heads of villages, one slaying his fellows both high and low. Then other times came afterwards in the empty years, and a Syrian with them made himself prince. He set the entire land tributary under his sway. He united his companions and plundered their possessions. They made the gods like the people, and no offerings were presented in the temples." The king then claims: "He brought to order the entire land, which had been rebellious. He slew the disaffected of heart who had been in Egypt. He cleansed the great throne of Egypt .... He established the temples Pritchard's "Ancient Near Eastern Texts", page 260).
Here is an era of many "empty years" -- with no native kings. Only officials and village headsmen. Foreign princes had Egypt in tribute. The religion of Egypt was suppressed; its temples bare. Not in all the history of Egypt had such a time occurred from the days of Nimrod to the Persian conquest! Even the Hyksos period had its own native kings ruling under the foreign Shepherd Princes. But here is a time when no native kings ruled.
Only one period in Egyptian annals corresponds to this tragic era -- the time of the Persian conquest and dominion. Dynasty XX of Thebes therefore rose to power during the period of rebellion against Persia in the fourth century before the present era. Yet historians would place the dynasty nearly eight centuries earlier -- in the time of the prophet Samuel and of king Saul!
The most famous king of Dynasty XX was Ramesses III. In his 8th year he fought a tremendous battle against invaders from Asia. These invaders are usually assumed to be Philistines. History texts claim that Ramesses' victory over the "Philistines" forced them to withdraw from Egypt and settle in Palestine, where they commenced their attacks against Israel in the time of Saul. This reconstruction of history is an utter fiction! Historians have willingly forgotten that the Philistines were already dwelling in Palestine in the days of Abram -- over eight centuries before the kingship of Saul. "And Abraham sojourned in the land of the Philistines many days" (Genesis 21:34, also verse 32).
The invaders whom Ramesses III repelled in his eighth year were "sea peoples" -- from the isles and coastlands of the northern Mediterranean. They were mercenary troops of a vast empire that ruled in Asia Minor and over Palestine. That was the Persian Empire -- and its mercenaries were Greeks and their allies! The Egyptian word Haunebu, applied by Ramesses III to the northern sea peoples, is the very same word found on Egyptian monuments in reference to Greeks! (See E. Naville's "The Shrine of Saft el Henneh and the Land of Goshen" (1887), pages 6 ff.)
Ramesses III's invaders were crested soldiers. The Greeks were famous for their crested troops. Ramesses' enemies moved through Palestine. So did the Persian and Greek troops in 373. By contrast, there was no land invasion from Asia Minor through Palestine in the days of Samuel or Saul!
Ramesses defeated his enemies at the time of the rising Nile. The Persians and Greeks were defeated in 373 at the time of the Nile floods ("Diodorus Siculus", XV, 41-43). Ramesses III speaks of natural calamity and unrest in the isles of the sea peoples. In 373 the Greek isles were devastated with frightful earthquakes and floods, according to Diodorus and other ancient writers.
The dates of Ramesses III may now be established as follows:
Ramesses III -- 31 years -- 381-350.
His 8th year was 374-373, the year of his great victory. Ramesses also records victories in his 5th and 11th years over Libyan and other invaders. His 5th year began in 377, his 11th year in 371. Now turn to the account of Dynasty XXX. The year 377 marked the beginning of the 16 years assigned by the Demotic Chronicle to Nectanebes. The year 371 begins his 10-year reign according to Eusebius. Thus the reign of Ramesses III, with its records of major wars in Egypt, provides the clues for the unusual dates sometimes assigned to Dynasty XXX.
The father of Ramesses III is known to historians as Setnakhte. His highest regnal date found on the monuments is Year 2. His reign, of little historical significance, was at least extended over the years 383-381. It is highly probable that he reigned no longer than these two years. A war between the Persians and Egyptians was fought about years 385-383. As Setnakhte was famous as a general, it appears that he arose in power in Thebes following the repulse of the Persian armies. The ancestry of Setnakhte is unknown, though the family was probably Ethiopian in origin. Everywhere they mimicked the ways of the famous Ethiopian king Ramesses II -- the Tarhakah of the Bible.
Manetho's transcribers provide no names
for these kings, nor any individual lengths of reign. The only source
of evidence is from the monuments and papyri. The unusual abundance
of well-preserved papyri and monuments is another strong indication
of the lateness of Dynasty XX. ("Egypt of the Pharaohs",
Gardiner, page 299.) From these records the following information may
be deduced.
Names of Kings of Dynasty XX of Thebes |
Known Lengths of Reign |
Resultant Dates |
Setnakhte |
2
|
383-381 |
Ramesse-hekaon (III) |
31
|
381-350 |
Ramesse-hekamae (IV) |
6
|
350-344 |
Ramesse-Amenhikhopshef (v) |
4
|
344-340 |
Nebmare Ramesse (VI) |
7
|
340-333 |
Usimare-akhenamun Ramesse (VII) |
---
|
--- |
Ramesse-itamun-nutehekaon (VIII) |
7
|
333-326 |
The records of Ramesses VII and VIII are very obscure. There are no known dates for Usimare-akhenamun Ramesse (designated Ramesses VII in Bibl. Or., xiv, 138). A badly tattered document indicates that Ramesse-itamun-nutehekaon (VIII) reigned possibly 7 years. That his reign was PARALLEL with Ramesse IX is indicated by a papyrus discussed in "The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology", xi, 72-75 and xiv, 60.
Of far greater interest are the three
succeeding Ramessides, listed and dated in the next chart. (A
discussion of the dates follows.)
Neferkare Ramesse (IX) |
17
|
343-326 |
Khepermare Ramesse (X) |
3
|
326-323 |
Menmare Ramesse (XI) |
27 --
|
323-296 -- |
The Persian conquest of Egypt in 343 brought to power a collateral branch of the Ramessid family. Ramesses V was deprived of most royal prerogatives. (See page 297 of Gardiner's "Egypt of the Pharaohs".) In his place ascended Neferkare Ramesse, in whose latter years foreigners and sea peoples -- Greeks! -- were found in Thebes. The years of Ramesses IX disclose great unrest and serious unemployment -- a result of the Persian conquest and the later penetration of the Greeks.
Ramesses XI is famous for the controversial "Renaissance" -- or rebirth of Egyptian influence -- which commenced in his 19th year. The 19th year is 305-304 -- the very year that Egypt became independent under Ptolemy I. The Renaissance or "renewal of birth" is the independence of Egypt under the Ptolemies'
Further, after year 17 of Ramesses XI there was a rebellion of Pinhasi in Upper Egypt coupled with a "war in the Northern District" (Lower Egypt). This struggle occurred before the Renaissance, hence in year 18. Year 18 of Ramesses XI was 306-305 -- the year that Egypt was invaded -- unsuccessfully -- by Antigonus of Syria.
The remaining history of the petty rulers under the Ptolemies is exceedingly obscure -- and historically of little value. Theban and Tanite royalty are known for several generations following the Ramessides. They are mistakenly labeled by historians as Dynasty XXI -- but have nothing in common with the Tanite Dynasty XXI as found in Manetho. Most of their time was spent in rewraping the mummies of the ancient pharaohs. A much misunderstood monument is the Bubastite Portal at Karnak. Containing material pertaining to Dynasty XXII and built after the reign of Ramesses III, it is at times called upon to support a false early dating of Dynasty XX. The answer is quite simple. The inscriptions are late reproductions inscribed by Bubastite officials in honor of their early and famous kings -- the Soshenks and the Osorkons. It was commonplace during the Persian and Greek period to revive the past.
With this chapter the restoration of Egyptian history is complete.
Next
Prev
Table of Contents
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
http://www.cgca.net/coglinks/wcglit/hoehcompendium/hhc1ch9.htm
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
No comments:
Post a Comment